Understanding the Differences: What is GitLab vs GitHub?

by Devop · 28/08/2024

When it comes to managing code, GitLab and GitHub are two of the most popular platforms. Both offer a range of features for developers, but they also have key differences that can make one more suitable than the other depending on your needs. This article will help you understand these differences by breaking them down into several categories, such as authentication, pricing, and built-in features.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

GitLab offers more flexible permission settings compared to GitHub’s simpler access options.
GitLab’s free plan includes unlimited private repositories, while GitHub charges for private repositories.
GitLab allows self-hosting on your own servers, giving you more control over your data.
GitLab has built-in CI/CD pipelines, whereas GitHub requires third-party tools for CI/CD integration.
GitLab is highly customizable, unlike GitHub, which has limited customization options.

Authentication and Access Control

GitLab’s Flexible Permissions

GitLab offers a wide range of options for setting and modifying access permissions. This flexibility allows teams to assign different roles and responsibilities within the project. You can fine-tune who gets to see and do what, making it ideal for complex projects. This level of control is a big plus for larger teams.

GitHub’s Simpler Access Options

GitHub, on the other hand, provides more straightforward read/write access options. It’s easier to manage but offers less granularity. This simplicity can be a benefit for smaller teams or open-source projects where ease of use is more important than detailed control.

Comparing Security Levels

When it comes to security, both platforms have their strengths. GitLab’s fine-grained access controls make it suitable for high-security projects. GitHub’s simpler model is easier to manage but may not meet the needs of projects requiring stringent security measures.

Choosing between GitLab and GitHub often comes down to the specific needs of your team and project. If you need more control, GitLab is the way to go. For simplicity, GitHub is a solid choice.

Pricing Models

GitLab’s Free Plan Benefits

GitLab offers a free plan that includes 5 GB of storage, 10 GB of transfer per month, and 400 CI/CD minutes monthly. This plan supports up to 5 users per namespace, making it a great option for small teams or individual developers. GitLab’s free plan is packed with features that can help you get started without spending a dime.

GitHub’s Paid Options for Private Repositories

GitHub provides a range of paid plans, starting with the Team plan at $4 per user/month. This plan includes everything in the free version plus protected branches and GitHub Codespaces. For larger organizations, the Enterprise plan at $21 per user/month offers user provisioning and an audit log API. GitHub’s pricing is designed to be flexible and scalable.

Cost-Effectiveness for Teams

When comparing the two, GitLab’s Premium plan at $19 per user/month offers advanced project management and code integrity controls. On the other hand, GitHub’s Team plan is more affordable but may lack some advanced features. The choice between GitLab and GitHub often comes down to the specific needs and budget of your team.

Choosing between GitLab and GitHub can be tough, but understanding their pricing models can help you make an informed decision.

Self-Hosting Options

GitLab’s Self-Hosting Capabilities

When it comes to self-hosting, GitLab is the clear winner. GitLab started as an open-source platform, and it still offers a self-hosted version. You can host GitLab on your own servers, even with the free plan. This gives you full control over your data and workflows. GitLab’s self-hosted environments also benefit from security automation, which integrates seamlessly with project management and delivery processes.

GitHub’s Cloud-Based Service

GitHub, on the other hand, focuses more on cloud-based services. Self-hosting is only available with GitHub’s enterprise plan, which can be a barrier for smaller teams. GitHub’s cloud-based approach means you don’t have to worry about server maintenance, but it also means less control over your data. This makes GitHub a better option for teams that prioritize ease of use over customization.

Control Over Repositories and Data

With GitLab, you have complete control over your repositories and data. This is especially important for projects that require high security and customization. GitHub’s cloud-based service offers convenience but at the cost of control. If you need to ensure your data stays on your own servers, GitLab is the better choice. However, if you prefer a hassle-free setup, GitHub’s cloud service is more suitable.

For teams that need full control over their data and workflows, GitLab’s self-hosting capabilities are unmatched. However, if ease of use and minimal maintenance are your priorities, GitHub’s cloud-based service is a strong contender.

Built-In Features

Project Management Tools

GitLab and GitHub both offer robust project management tools. GitLab provides integrated boards, milestones, and time tracking, making it easy to manage projects from start to finish. GitHub, on the other hand, offers project boards and issue tracking, which are great for organizing tasks and tracking progress. Both platforms help teams stay on top of their work and collaborate effectively.

CI/CD Integration

One of GitLab’s standout features is its built-in CI/CD pipelines. This allows teams to automate the entire software delivery process, from code commit to production deployment. GitHub also supports CI/CD, but it relies more on third-party integrations like Jenkins or CircleCI. This means GitLab offers a more seamless and integrated experience for continuous integration and deployment.

Issue Tracking and More

Both GitLab and GitHub excel in issue tracking. GitLab’s issue tracking system is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor it to their specific needs. GitHub’s issue tracking is straightforward and easy to use, making it a favorite among developers. Additionally, GitLab offers built-in security scanning and container management, while GitHub focuses more on community collaboration and extensive third-party integrations.

When choosing between GitLab and GitHub, consider what built-in features are most important for your workflow. GitLab’s all-in-one platform might be ideal for those seeking a comprehensive solution, while GitHub’s simplicity and community focus could be more appealing to others.

Security Features

Fine-Grained Access Controls in GitLab

GitLab offers fine-grained access controls that allow managers to assign different permission levels to team members. This is ideal for organizations that need role-based access. Confidentiality can also be managed based on these access levels, ensuring that only certain roles can view sensitive data.

Mandatory Code Reviews

Both GitLab and GitHub support mandatory code reviews, but GitLab’s approach is more robust. GitLab allows for more detailed review processes, which can be crucial for maintaining high code quality. GitHub also supports code reviews but lacks some of the advanced features found in GitLab.

Security for High-Sensitivity Projects

When it comes to high-sensitivity projects, GitLab is generally considered more secure. GitLab includes features like a security dashboard and license compliance, which GitHub lacks. This makes GitLab a better choice for projects that require stringent security measures.

In terms of security, GitHub is less secure than GitLab due to lacking features like a security dashboard and license compliance, while GitLab is more secure.

CI/CD Support

GitLab’s Built-In Pipelines

GitLab shines with its built-in CI/CD pipelines. This means you can automate your build, test, and deployment processes without needing extra tools. It’s all integrated, making it easier for teams to streamline their workflows. You can set up pipelines with just a few clicks, and they run every time you push code, ensuring your software is always in top shape.

Third-Party CI/CD Integration in GitHub

GitHub, on the other hand, relies on third-party tools for CI/CD. While it offers GitHub Actions, many teams still use external services like Jenkins or CircleCI. This can be a bit more complex to set up but offers flexibility. You can choose the tools that best fit your needs, giving you control over your CI/CD process.

Automated Testing and Deployment

Both platforms support automated testing and deployment, but they do it differently. In GitLab, everything is in one place, making it easier to manage. GitHub’s approach, with its reliance on third-party tools, can be more flexible but might require more setup. Automated testing ensures your code is always tested before it goes live, reducing the risk of bugs in production.

When choosing between GitLab and GitHub for CI/CD, consider your team’s needs. If you want an all-in-one solution, GitLab is a great choice. If you prefer flexibility and don’t mind a bit more setup, GitHub might be the way to go.

Explore the flexibility of our tools while ensuring you stay compliant with licensing requirements. Our platform offers a range of customization options to fit your unique needs. Visit our website to learn more and get started today!

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between GitLab and GitHub in terms of access control?

GitLab offers more flexible permissions, allowing you to set and change access levels for different team roles. GitHub, on the other hand, has simpler read/write access options.

How do the pricing models of GitLab and GitHub differ?

GitLab provides a free plan with unlimited private repositories, which is great for small to medium teams. GitHub offers free plans for public repositories but charges for private ones.

Can I self-host GitLab and GitHub?

You can self-host GitLab on your own servers, giving you more control over your data and repositories. GitHub is mainly a cloud-based service and doesn’t offer the same level of self-hosting options.

What built-in features do GitLab and GitHub offer?

GitLab includes project management tools, CI/CD integration, and issue tracking as part of its built-in features. GitHub offers similar features but often requires third-party integrations for full functionality.

Which platform has better CI/CD support, GitLab or GitHub?

GitLab has built-in CI/CD pipelines, making it a one-stop shop for automated testing and deployment. GitHub supports CI/CD but usually requires third-party tools for integration.

How do GitLab and GitHub compare in terms of customization?

GitLab is highly customizable and offers built-in license compliance tools. GitHub has more limited customization options and lacks built-in license compliance features.